Intrapulmonary Shunt and Alveolar Dead Space in a Cohort of Patients with Acute COVID-19 Pneumonitis and Early Recovery.

BACKGROUND: Pathological evidence suggests that COVID-19 pulmonary infection involves both alveolar damage (causing shunt) and diffuse micro-vascular thrombus formation (causing alveolar dead space). We propose that measuring respiratory gas exchange enables detection and quantification of these abnormalities. We aimed to measure shunt and alveolar deadspace in moderate COVID-19 during acute illness and recovery. METHODS: We studied 30 patients (22 males, age: 49.9±13.5 years) 3-15 days from symptom onset and again during recovery, 55±10 days later (n=17). Arterial blood (breathing ambient air) was collected while exhaled O2 and CO2 concentrations were measured, yielding alveolar-arterial differences for each gas (AaPO2, aAPCO2) from which shunt and alveolar dead space were computed. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: For acute COVID-19 patients, group mean (range) for AaPO2 was 41.4 (-3.5 to 69.3) mmHg; aAPCO2 was 6.0 (-2.3 to 13.4) mmHg. Both shunt (% cardiac output) at 10.4 (0 to 22.0)%, and alveolar dead space (% tidal volume) at 14.9 (0 to 32.3)% were elevated (normal: <5% and <10%, respectively), but not correlated (p=0.27). At recovery, shunt was 2.4 (0 to 6.1)% and alveolar dead space was 8.5 (0 to 22.4)% (both p<0.05 versus acute); shunt was marginally elevated for 2 patients, however, 5 (30%) had elevated alveolar dead space. CONCLUSIONS: We speculate impaired pulmonary gas exchange in early COVID-19 pneumonitis arises from two concurrent, independent and variable processes (alveolar filling and pulmonary vascular obstruction). For most patients these resolve within weeks, however, high alveolar dead space in ∼30% of recovered patients suggests persistent pulmonary vascular pathology.

Using pulmonary gas exchange to estimate shunt and deadspace in lung disease: theoretical approach and practical basis.

The common pulmonary consequence of SARS-CoV-2 infection is pneumonia, but vascular clot may also contribute to COVID pathogenesis. Imaging and hemodynamic approaches to identifying diffuse pulmonary vascular obstruction (PVO) in COVID (or acute lung injury generally) are problematic particularly when pneumonia is widespread throughout the lung and hemodynamic consequences are buffered by pulmonary vascular recruitment and distention. Although stimulated by COVID-19, we propose a generally applicable bedside gas exchange approach to identifying PVO occurring alone or in combination with pneumonia, addressing both its theoretical and practical aspects. It is based on knowing that poorly (or non) ventilated regions, as occur in pneumonia, affect O2 more than CO2, whereas poorly (or non) perfused regions, as seen in PVO, affect CO2 more than O2. Exhaled O2 and CO2 concentrations at the mouth are measured over several ambient-air breaths, to determine mean alveolar Po2 and Pco2. A single arterial blood sample is taken over several of these breaths for arterial Po2 and Pco2. The resulting alveolar-arterial Po2 and Pco2 differences (AaPo2, aAPco2) are converted to corresponding physiological shunt and deadspace values using the Riley and Cournand 3-compartment model. For example, a 30% shunt (from pneumonia) with no alveolar deadspace produces an AaPO2 of almost 50 torr, but an aAPco2 of only 3 torr. In contrast, a 30% alveolar deadspace (from PVO) without shunt leads to an AaPO2 of only 12 torr, but an aAPco2 of 9 torr. This approach can identify and quantify physiological shunt and deadspace when present singly or in combination.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Identifying pulmonary vascular obstruction in the presence of pneumonia (e.g., in COVID-19) is difficult. We present here conversion of bedside measurements of arterial and alveolar Po2 and Pco2 into values for shunt and deadspace-when both coexist-using Riley and Cournand's 3-compartment gas exchange model. Deadspace values higher than expected from shunt alone indicate high ventilation/perfusion ratio areas likely reflecting (micro)vascular obstruction.

COVID-19 Rehabilitation With Herbal Medicine and Cardiorespiratory Exercise: Protocol for a Clinical Study.

BACKGROUND: Recent studies have revealed that many discharged patients with COVID-19 experience ongoing symptoms months later. Rehabilitation interventions can help address the consequences of COVID-19, including medical, physical, cognitive, and psychological problems. To our knowledge, no studies have investigated the effects of rehabilitation following discharge from hospital for patients with COVID-19. OBJECTIVE: The specific aims of this project are to investigate the effects of a 12-week exercise program on pulmonary fibrosis in patients recovering from COVID-19. A further aim will be to examine how Chinese herbal medicines as well as the gut microbiome and its metabolites regulate immune function and possibly autoimmune deficiency in the rehabilitation process. METHODS: In this triple-blinded, randomized, parallel-group, controlled clinical trial, we will recruit adult patients with COVID-19 who have been discharged from hospital in Hong Kong and are experiencing impaired lung function and pulmonary function. A total of 172 eligible patients will be randomized into four equal groups: (1) cardiorespiratory exercise plus Chinese herbal medicines group, (2) cardiorespiratory exercise only group, (3) Chinese herbal medicines only group, and (4) waiting list group (in which participants will receive Chinese herbal medicines after 24 weeks). These treatments will be administered for 12 weeks, with a 12-week follow-up period. Primary outcomes include dyspnea, fatigue, lung function, pulmonary function, blood oxygen levels, immune function, blood coagulation, and related blood biochemistry. Measurements will be recorded prior to initiating the above treatments and repeated at the 13th and 25th weeks of the study. The primary analysis is aimed at comparing the outcomes between groups throughout the study period with an α level of .05 (two-tailed). RESULTS: The trial has been approved by the university ethics committee following the Declaration of Helsinki (approval number: REC/19-20/0504) in 2020. The trial has been recruiting patients. The data collection will be completed in 24 months, from January 1, 2021, to December 31, 2022. CONCLUSIONS: Given that COVID-19 and its sequelae would persist in human populations, important findings from this study would provide valuable insights into the mechanisms and processes of COVID-19 rehabilitation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04572360; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04572360. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/25556.